School Technology Leadership and The Maker Movement

Author :  

Year-Number: 2021-Cilt 1 Sayı 1
Yayımlanma Tarihi: 2021-09-14 09:47:28.0
Language : İngilizce
Konu : Eğitim Bilimleri
Number of pages: 27-41
Mendeley EndNote Alıntı Yap

Abstract

The developments and changes that have been made in the world affect the educational, health or economic systems of the countries. This situation requires the schools to renew themselves. In the recent year the Covid-19 pandemic that has been experienced all around the world has accelerated this process. It showed clearly that schools should be the places where real life experiences are taught and integrated with life. Regarding this, it was aimed to present a detailed perspective about maker movement and technology leadership that are closely related to the point of view that schools should be the life itself. Accordingly, a general perspective about leadership has been summarized shortly at the beginning of the study and then technology leadership and maker movement have been presented in a detailed way and reflections of technology leadership and maker movement have been discussed. Lastly, some suggestions have been proposed for both teachers and school principals. 

Keywords

Abstract

The developments and changes that have been made in the world affect the educational, health or economic systems of the countries. This situation requires the schools to renew themselves. In the recent year the Covid-19 pandemic that has been experienced all around the world has accelerated this process. It showed clearly that schools should be the places where real life experiences are taught and integrated with life. Regarding this, it was aimed to present a detailed perspective about maker movement and technology leadership that are closely related to the point of view that schools should be the life itself. Accordingly, a general perspective about leadership has been summarized shortly at the beginning of the study and then technology leadership and maker movement have been presented in a detailed way and reflections of technology leadership and maker movement have been discussed. Lastly, some suggestions have been proposed for both teachers and school principals. 

Keywords


  • Afshari, M., Abu Bakar, K., Luan, W., Fooi, F. & Abu Samah, B. (2010). Computer use by secondary school principals. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 8–25.

  • Aga, D. A., Noorderhaven, N. & Vallejo, B. (2016). Transformational leadership and project success: The mediating role of team-building. International Journal of Project Management, 34(5), 806-818.

  • AI Sharija, M. & Watters, J.J. (2012). Innovative leadership by school principals: Embedding information communication and technology in Kuwaiti schools. Journal of International Education Research, 8(4), 425–434.

  • Alenezi, A. (2017). Technology leadership in Saudi schools. Education and Information Technologies, 22(3), 1121–1132.

  • Allan, W. C., Erickson, J. L., Brookhouse, P. & Johnson, J. L. (2010). EcoScienceWorks: Teacher professional development through a collaborative curriculum project-an example of TPACK in Maine. TechTrends, 54(6), 36–43.

  • Anderson, R. E. & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An empirical investigation of prevalence and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(1), 49–82.

  • Anthony, A. B. (2011). Activity theory as a framework for investigating district-classroom system interactions and their influences on technology integration. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 44(4), 335–356.

  • Apsorn, A., Sisan, B. & Tungkunanan, P. (2019). Information and communication technology leadership of school administrators in Thailand. International Journal of Instruction, 12(2), 639.

  • Author 1 (2013). Challenges school principals facing in the context of technology leadership. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 13(2), 1273–1284.

  • Banoğlu, K. (2011). School principals’ technology leadership competency and technology coordinatorship. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 199–213.

  • Berry, R. Q., Bull, G., Browning, C., Thomas, C. D., Starkweather, K., & Aylor, J. H. (2010). Use of digital fabrication to incorporate engineering design principles in elementary mathematics education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 10(2), 167–172.

  • Bullock, S. M. & Sator, A. J. (2015). Maker pedagogy and science teacher education. Journal of the Canadian Association for Curriculum Studies, 13(1), 60-87.

  • Chang, E. (2019). Bridging an engagement gap: towards equitable, community-based technology leadership practice. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 22(5), 536–554.

  • Chang, I.-H., Chin, J. M. & Hsu, C.-M. (2008). International forum of educational technology & society teachers’ perceptions of the dimensions and implementation of technology leadership of principals in Taiwanese elementary schools. Educational Technology & Society, 11(4), 229–245.

  • Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G. & Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of Computers & Education. Computers and Education, 151, 103855.

  • Chiu, T. K. F. (2017). Introducing electronic textbooks as daily-use technology in schools: A top-down adoption process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 524– 537.

  • Clapp, E. P., Ross, J., Ryan, J. O., & Tishman, S. (2016). Maker-centered learning: Empowering young people to shape their worlds. John Wiley & Sons.

  • Cohen, J., Jones, W. M., Smith, S., & Calandra, B. (2017). Makification: Towards a framework for leveraging the maker movement in formal education. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 26(3), 217-229.

  • Collins, C. E. (2017). We are all makers: A case study of one suburban district's implementation of makerspaces. (Degree of Doctor of Education). College of Professional Studies Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts.

  • Courduff, J., Szapkiw, A. & Wendt, J. L. (2016). Grounded in What Works, Journal of Special Education Technology, 31(1), 26–38.

  • Cuban, L., Kirkpatrick, H. & Peck, C. (2001). High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: Explaining an apparent paradox. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 813–834.

  • Davidson, J. (2003). A new role in facilitating school reform: The case of the educational technologist, Teachers College Record - TEACH COLL REC, 105(5), 729–752.

  • Davidson, J. & Olson, M. (2003). School leadership in networked schools: Deciphering the impact of large technical systems on education. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 6(3), 261–281.

  • Devolder, A., Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J. & Tondeur, J. (2010). Identifying multiple roles of ICT coordinators. Computers and Education, 55(4), 1651–1655.

  • Dexter, S. (2011). School technology leadership: Artifacts in systems of practice. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 166–189.

  • Dexter, S. & Richardson, J. W. (2020). What does technology integration research tell us about the leadership of technology?. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 17–36.

  • Dexter, S., Richardson, J. W. & Nash, J. B. (2016). Leadership for technology use, integration, and innovation: A review of the empirical research and implications for leadership preparation. Young, M. D., Crow, G. M. (2nd Ed.), Handbook of Research on the Education of School Leaders (202-228). Routledge: New York, 202–228.

  • Divaharan, S. & Lim, C. P. (2010). Secondary school socio-cultural context influencing ICT integration – A case study approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 26, 741–763.

  • Dougherty, D. (2012). The maker movement. Innovations: Technology, governance, globalization, 7(3), 11-14.

  • Dougherty, D. & Conrad, A. (2016). Free to make: How the maker movement is changing our schools, our jobs, and our minds. North Atlantic Books:Berkeley, CA.

  • Esplin, N. L., Stewart, C. & Thurston, T. N. (2018). Technology leadership perceptions of Utah elementary school principals. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(4),

  • Flanagan, L. & Jacobsen, M. (2003). Technology leadership for the twenty-first century principal. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 124–142.

  • Gächter, S. & Renner, E. (2018). Leaders as role models and ‘belief managers’ in social dilemmas. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 154, 321-334.

  • Gadirajurrett, H; Srinivasan, R.; Stevens, J. & Jeena, N., (2018). Impact of Leadership on Team’s Performance. Engineering and Technology Management Student Projects. 1912. https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/etm_studentprojects/1912

  • Gallego-Arrufat, M.-J., Gutiérrez-Santiuste, E. & Campaña-Jiménez, R. (2017). School technology leadership in a Spanish secondary school: The TEI model. Improving Schools, 20(3), 247–263.

  • Gerard, L., Bowyer, J. & Linn, M. (2010). How does a community of principals develop leadership for technology-enhanced science?. Journal of School Leadership, 20(2),

  • Gerard, L. F., Bowyer, J. B. & Linn, M. C. (2008). Principal leadership for technology- enhanced learning in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(1), 1– 18.

  • Gibson, I. W. (2002). Leadership, technology, and education: Achieving a balance in new school leader thinking and behaviour in preparation for twenty-first century global learning environments. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education,

  • Glazer, E. M., Hannafin, M. J., Polly, D. & Rich, P. (2009). Factors and interactions influencing technology integration during situated professional development in an elementary school. Computers in the Schools, 26(1), 21–39.

  • Gonzales, M. M. (2019). School technology leadership vision and challenges: Perspectives from American school administrators. International Journal of Educational Management, 34(4), 697–708.

  • Guek, F. S. (2015). Makerspace at Singapore Polytechnic. Singapore Journal of Library & Information Management, 44, 1-10.

  • Gurr, D. (2004). ICT, Leadership in education and e-leadership. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 25(1), 113–124.

  • Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (1998). Exploring the Principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980-1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–

  • Halverson, E. R. & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The maker movement in education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495-505.

  • Harris, J. B. & Hofer, M. J. (2017). TPACK stories: Schools and school districts repurposing a theoretical construct for technology-related professional development. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 49(1–2), 1–15.

  • Harron, J. R. & Hughes, J. E. (2018) Spacemakers: A leadership perspective on curriculum and the purpose of K–12 educational makerspaces, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 50(3), 253-270. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2018.1461038

  • Hira, A. & Hynes, M. M. (2018). People, means, and activities: A conceptual framework for realizing the educational potential of makerspaces. Education Research International, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/6923617

  • Hitt, D. H. & Tucker, P. D. (2016). Systematic review of key leader practices found to influence student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 531–569.

  • Hsu, Y. C., Baldwin, S. & Ching, Y. H. (2017). Learning through making and maker education. TechTrends, 61(6), 589-594.

  • Inan, F. A. & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Laptops in the K-12 classrooms: Exploring factors impacting instructional use. Computers and Education, 55(3), 937–944.

  • Jones, W. M. & Dexter, S. (2014). How teachers learn: The roles of formal, informal, and independent learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 62(3), 367–

  • Kafai, Y. B. (2018) Building a home for the maker movement. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 4-5. DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2017.1398970

  • Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P. & Voogt, J. (2016). Factors affecting teachers’ continuation of technology use in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1535–

  • Kebritchi, M. (2009). Factors affecting teachers' adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(2), 256-270. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00921.x

  • Kjällander, S., Åkerfeldt, A., Mannila, L. & Parnes, P. (2018). Makerspaces across settings: Didactic design for programming in formal and informal teacher education in the Nordic countries. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 18-30. DOI: 10.1080/21532974.2017.1387831

  • Kearsley, G. & Lynch, W. (1992). Educational leadership in the age of technology: The new skills. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25(1), 50–60.

  • Kurti, R. S., Kurti, D. L. & Fleming, L. (2014). The philosophy of educational makerspaces part 1 of making an educational makerspace. Teacher Librarian, 41(5), 8-11.

  • Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). Review of research: How leadership influences student learning. University of Minnesota, Center for Applied Research and Educational Improvement: Wallace Foundation. Retrived from https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/2035

  • Leonard, L. J. & Leonard, P. E. (2006). Leadership for technology integration: Computing the reality. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 52(4), 212-224.

  • Levin, B. B. & Schrum, L. (2013). Using systems thinking to leverage technology for school improvement. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(1), 29–51.

  • Lindstrom, D., Thompson, A. D. & Schmidt-Crawford, D. A. (2017) The maker: democratizing STEM education and empowering learners to shape their world. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(3), 89-90. Doi: 10.1080/21532974.2017.1316153

  • Louis, K. S., Leithwood, K., Wahlstrom, K. L., Anderson, S. E., Michlin, M. & Mascall, B. (2010). Learning from leadership: Investigating the links to improved student learning. New York, NY: Wallace Foundation.

  • Martin, L. (2015). The Promise of the maker movement for education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 5(1), 30-39. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157

  • McKenney, S., Boschman, F., Pieters, J. & Voogt, J. (2016). Collaborative Design of Technology-Enhanced Learning: What can We Learn from Teacher Talk?. TechTrends,

  • Moreira, M. A., Rivero, V. M. H. & Sosa Alonso, J. J. (2019). Leadership and school integration of ICT. Teachers perceptions in Spain. Education and Information Technologies, 24(1),

  • Northouse, G. (2007). Leadership theory and practice. (3rd ed.) Thousand Oak, London, New Delhe, Sage Publications, Inc.

  • Paganelli, A., Cribbs, J. D., ‘Silvie’Huang, X., Pereira, N., Huss, J., Chandler, W. & Paganelli, A. (2017). The makerspace experience and teacher professional development. Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 232-235.

  • Papa, R. (2011). Technology leadership for school improvement, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, California.

  • Peppler, K. & Bender, S. (2013). Maker movement spreads innovation one project at a time. Kappan, 95(3), 22-27.

  • Rafferty, A. E. & Griffin, M. A. (2004). Dimensions of transformational leadership: Conceptual and empirical extensions. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(3), 329-354.

  • Raman, A., Thannimalai, R. & Noor, S. I. (2019). Principals’ technology leadership and its effect on teachers’ technology integration in 21st century classrooms. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 423.

  • Redish, T. & Chan, T. C. (2007). Technology leadership: Aspiring administrators’ perceptions of their leadership preparation program. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education, 6, 123–139.

  • Richardson, J. W., Flora, K. & Bathon, J. (2013). Fostering a school technology vision in school leader. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 8(1), 144-160.

  • Richardson, J. W. & McLeod, S. (2011). Technology leadership in native american schools. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 26(7), 1–14.

  • Richardson, J. W., McLeod, S. & Sauers, N. (2015). Technology leadership is just good leadership: Dispositions of tech savvy superintendents. AASA Journal of Scholarship & Practice, 12(1), 11–30.

  • Richardson, J. W. & Sterrett, W. L. (2018). District technology leadership then and now: A comparative study of district technology leadership from 2001 to 2014. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(4), 589–616.

  • Ritzhaupt, A. D., Hohlfeld, T. N., Barron, A. E. & Kemker, K. (2008). Trends in Technology Planning and Funding in Florida K-12 Public Schools. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 3(8), 1–17.

  • Robertson, M., Grady, N., Fluck, A. & Webb, I. (2006). Conversations toward effective implementation of information communication technologies in Australian schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 44(1), 71–85.

  • Rodriguez, S. R., Harron, J. R. & DeGraff, M. W. (2018). UTeach maker: A micro-credentialing program for preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(1), 6-17. Doi: 10.1080/21532974.2017.1387830

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations. New York: Free Press.

  • Rouse, R., Krummeck, K. & Uribe, O. (2020). Making the Most of a Makerspace. Science and Children, 57(6), 31-35.

  • Sauers, N. J. & Richardson, J. W. (2019). Leading the pack: Developing empowering responsible use policies. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(1), 27–

  • Schad, M. & Jones, W. M. (2019). The maker movement and education: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(1), 65-78. Doi: 10.1080/15391523.2019.1688739

  • Schiller, J. (2003). Working with ICT: Perceptions of Australian principals. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(2), 171–185.

  • Schmidt-Crawford, D. A., Lindstrom, D. & Thompson, A. D. (2018). Addressing the “Why” for Integrating technology in teacher preparation. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 34(3), 132-133. Doi: 10.1080/21532974.2018.1465783

  • Schrum, L., Galizio, L. & Ledesma, P. (2011). Educational leadership and technology integration: An investigation into preparation, experiences, and roles. Journal of School Leadership, 21(2), 241–261.

  • Seong, D. N. F. & Ho, J. M. (2012). How leadership for an ICT reform is distributed within a school. International Journal of Educational Management, 26(6), 529–549.

  • Sheninger, E. C. (2019). Digital leadership: Changing paradigms for changing times (2nd ed.). Corwin Press: USA.

  • Sheppard, B. & Brown, J. (2014). Leadership for a new vision of public school classrooms: Technology-smart and learner-centered. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(1),

  • Sims, R. R. & Brinkman, J. (2002). Leaders as moral role models: The case of John Gutfreund at Salomon Brothers. Journal of Business Ethics 35, 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013826126058

  • Smith, A. & Light, A. (2016). How to cultivate sustainable developments in makerspaces. Retrieved from http://steps-centre.org/wp-content/uploads/MC-report_final.pdf

  • Stošić, L. & Stosic, I. (2013). Diffusion of innovation in modern school. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education:(IJCRSEE), 1(1), 5-13.

  • Spillane, J. P. (2003). Educational leadership. Educational evaluation and policy Analysis, 25(4), 343-346.

  • Staples, A., Pugach, M. C. & Himes, D. (2015). Rethinking the technology integration challenge: Cases from three urban elementary schools. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(2), 285–311.

  • Sterrett, W. & Richardson, J. (2017). Cultivating innovation in an age of accountability: tech- savvy leadership. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 20(4), 27–41.

  • Stuart, L., Mills, A. & Remus, U. (2009). School leaders, ICT competence and championing innovations. Computers & Education, 53(3), 733–741.

  • Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P. & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56.

  • Svendsen, B. (2016). Teachers’ experience from a school-based collaborative teacher professional development programme: Reported impact on professional development. Teacher Development, 20(3), 313–328.

  • Taylor, C. M., Cornelius, C. J., & Colvin, K. (2014). Visionary leadership and its relationship to organizational effectiveness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 35(6), 566-583.

  • Thannimalai, R. & Raman, A. (2018). The influence of principals’ technology leadership and professional development on teachers’ technology integration in secondary schools. Malaysian Journal of Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 203–228.

  • Trust, T. (2016). New model of teacher learning in an online network. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(4), 290–305.

  • Vanderlinde, R., Van Braak, J. & Dexter, S. (2012). ICT policy planning in a context of curriculum reform: Disentanglement of ICT policy domains and artifacts. Computers and Education, 58(4), 1339–1350.

  • Vossoughi, S., & Bevan, B. (2014). Making and tinkering: A review of the literature. National Research Council Committee on Out of School Time STEM, 67, 1-55.

  • Vuorikari, R., Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2019). Makerspaces for Education and Training: Exploring future implications for Europe (No. JRC117481). Joint Research Centre (Seville site). Retrieved from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ipt/iptwpa/jrc117481.html

  • Wong, E., Li, S., Choi, T. & Lee, T. (2008). Insights into innovative classroom practices with ICT: Identifying the Impetus for Change. Educational Technology & Society, 11, 248–

  • Wong, E. M. L. & Li, S. C. (2008). Framing ICT implementation in a context of educational change: A multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(1),

  • Yee, D. L. (2000). Images of school principals’ information and communications technology leadership. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 9(3), 287–302.

  • Yu, C. & Durrington, V.A. (2006). Technology standards for school administrators: An analysis of practicing and aspiring administrators’ perceived ability to perform the standards. NASSP Bulletin, 90(4), 301–317.

                                                                                                                                                                                                        
  • Article Statistics